RE: moki namespace

Thanks Dom

Namespaces updated in CVS to match

Jo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux [mailto:dom@w3.org]
> Sent: 30 May 2007 15:37
> To: Jo Rabin
> Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> Subject: RE: moki namespace
> 
> Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 à 15:30 +0100, Jo Rabin a écrit :
> > This makes sense to me. Presumably the document at the ns uri ought to
> point to some documentation of some kind, but since we are in development
> that documentation doesn't exist.
> >
> > If we were to start using the namespace URI you suggest - I would
> suggest we do so straight away as an increasing number of documents are
> making reference to the ns - I'm hoping that this informal use doesn't
> break the rules and that we will only need the formal document at the URI
> once we go public?
> 
> I've created a document at the namespace URI:
> http://www.w3.org/2007/05/moki
> 
> and I think we should thus now use this as a namespace of the Moki
> document format.
> 
> Dom

Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 14:57:13 UTC