- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:01:47 +0100
- To: Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com>
- Cc: <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
Oh, thanks, I see your point.
Looks like a good idea to me.
Jo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roland Gülle [mailto:roland@7val.com]
> Sent: 15 May 2007 13:54
> To: Jo Rabin
> Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> Subject: Re: More checked into CVS
>
> > What I had in mind was transforming the error string dependent on a
> > choice of output language. Why would XINCLUDE work better than
> > xsl:include?
> The xsl:include is only allowed as a top-level element. We can use
> the XINCLUDE when the error occurs:
> -----------
> <xsl:variable name="language">en</xsl:variable>
>
> <xsl:if test="false()">
> <xi:include href="{$language}.xml" parse="xml"
> xpointer="element
> (errors/nr1)">
> <xi:fallback>error nr. 1</xi:fallback>
> </xi:include>
> </xsl:if>
> --------------
>
> roland
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 13:02:00 UTC