Re: More checked into CVS

> The main point was to ask if we really do need to use XSLT 2.0  
> features, and if not, then stick with 1.0.
+1 to XSLT 1.0

> Would it be better, for example, for the error messages to be  
> defined in an external XSLT file?
I would recommend an xinclude instead of an XSLT for error messages.

  roland

Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 12:14:55 UTC