Re: An intermediate document draft

Yes I think we'll have to define our own xmlns for new stuff to be
contained in this document. As long as we're reusing vocabularies
where possible, I'm pleased. I'm mostly content to let you guys drive
the definition of this and the output since you're the most interested
parties.

Sean

On 3/14/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi Abel
>
>
>
> This is a great start – I have added some comments in the attached ref some
> changes.
>
>
>
> I do think that the HTTP-in-RDF spec doesn't quite go far enough. As I
> mentioned I think that we'd like to see the field values normalized and
> parsed into a structure to make them more useful and accessible. Also I
> can't see how you show that a request failed to get an HTTP response at all.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Jo

Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 17:25:36 UTC