RE: Checker Task Force Report

We should have thought about this easy and obvious solution before I asked for no new commits.

Sorry O:-)

Nacho


-----Mensaje original-----
De: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org en nombre de Ignacio Marin
Enviado el: mié 18/07/2007 11:26
Para: Laura Holmes; Sean Owen
CC: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
Asunto: RE: Checker Task Force Report
 
Please do not worry about it. We are going to show a local stable version in Abel's PC.

Regards,

Nacho


-----Mensaje original-----
De: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org en nombre de Laura Holmes
Enviado el: mié 18/07/2007 11:19
Para: Sean Owen
CC: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
Asunto: Re: Checker Task Force Report
 
I committed some changes to the checker so that everyone could have the code
to run specific tests on real webpages. Also, there was some incorrect code
on some of the .xsl tests that caused tester crashes when applied to more
complex webpages. I made sure before I committed that it was running, but
I'm guessing I was operating on a different set of assumptions than some
others in the group. My apologies if this is the case.

Before my last commit yesterday, I last committed sometime last week. Hope
that helps with the rollback.

Laura

On 7/18/07, Sean Owen <srowen@google.com> wrote:
>
> Laura did you commit anything? just checking so we can coordinate a
> rollback or fix as needed...
>
> On 7/18/07, Ignacio Marin <ignacio.marin@fundacionctic.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi, Ruadhan:
> >
> >  The idea is to show mobile sites (some having few problems, some having
> > some more). We end up with one ready for PDA (Windows Mobile) and see
> how
> > many fails the checker reports. So we finish saying "guess what might
> happen
> > with a more complex desktop web page".
> >
> >  Anyway, if anyone wants to propose a desktop one to test, we are open
> to
> > it.
> >
> >  By the way, please do not commit anything to the CVS. We have been
> worked
> > to leave all the tests in a stable state and latest commits cause
> exceptions
> > to happen. Do not worry, as Abel and (remotely) Miguel are putting back
> > previous versions of the files.
> >
> >  Regards,
> >
> >  Nacho
> >
> >  -----Mensaje original-----
> >  De: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org en nombre de
> > Ruadhan O'Donoghue
> >  Enviado el: mar 17/07/2007 22:03
> >  Para: Abel Rionda; public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> >  Asunto: RE: Checker Task Force Report
> >
> >
> >  Just an observation but these are all mobile sites - what about also
> > demonstrating on a PC site, showing how such a site fails most of the
> BPs
> > and thus highlights the need for a mobile-friendly site?
> >
> >
> >
> >  Ruadhan
> >
> >
> >
> >  ________________________________
> >
> >  From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf
> > Of Abel Rionda
> >  Sent: 17 July 2007 18:38
> >  To: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> >  Subject: Checker Task Force Report
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  Hi everybody,
> >
> >  We have committed some code during these days in order to
> >  have the checker in a stable way.
> >  We have prepared  slides for the presentation but I can
> >  tell you what are the pages and tests we (think) are going
> >  to check:
> >
> >  Google XHTML site http://www.google.com/xhtml
> >  Entire test suite & some tests comments
> >
> >  BMW.mobi site http://bmw.moby
> >  CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT_AND_VALID_MARKUP
> >  EXTERNAL_RESOURCES
> >
> >  CTIC Foundation http://www.fundacionctic.org/
> >  IMAGES_RESIZING_IMAGES_SPECIFY_SIZE
> >
> >  NewsWeek http://mobile.newsweek.com/
> >  TABLES_LAYOUT
> >  STYLE_SHEETS_USE
> >  STYLE_SHEETS_SUPPORT
> >
> >  WindowsMobile http://windowsmediamobile.theplatform.com
> >  Entire Test Suite
> >
> >
> >
> >  ¿Any comments?
> >
> >  Regards,
> >
> >  Abel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>