- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 05:27:06 -0400
- To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: "Ruadhan O'Donoghue" <rodonoghue@mtld.mobi>, public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
Good point. This will be a statement about how that nth occurrence appears in the document rather than anything in particular about how that nth instance was retrieved. Hence I think we must be able to get away with one node describing how foo.gif was retrieved. Yes, indeed, you may still want to refer to the nth time it's referenced for the reason you give. On 7/6/07, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > Le vendredi 06 juillet 2007 à 05:10 -0400, Sean Owen a écrit : > > I am inclined to 'keep it simple' and go this way. If we want to say > > anything about foo.gif, and it's referenced 20 times in a document, > > does it help us a lot to point to the first versus nth occurrence of > > it? > > If we want to say that the third instance of foo.gif has wrong > dimensions set in the markup while all the others are fine, yes it > would. > > Dom > >
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 09:27:16 UTC