- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 05:10:50 -0400
- To: "Ruadhan O'Donoghue" <rodonoghue@mtld.mobi>
- Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
I am inclined to 'keep it simple' and go this way. If we want to say anything about foo.gif, and it's referenced 20 times in a document, does it help us a lot to point to the first versus nth occurrence of it? Sean On 7/6/07, Ruadhan O'Donoghue <rodonoghue@mtld.mobi> wrote: > That seems like a sensible thing to do, but we run into problems when we > want to record the position information of each reference to a unique > resource into moki. If we return just a list of unique resources, then > it means that we have to go back to the original document again at some > point to extract the position information, which is inefficient. > > If we are happy not to include the position information of each > reference to a resource, then sure, we can do it this way. But then we > will know all the unique resources in a document, but not the number of > times, or where, they occurred in that document. > > Ruadhan
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 09:10:58 UTC