- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:49:36 +0100
- To: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
Le jeudi 22 février 2007 à 11:45 -0500, Sean Owen a écrit : > How to proceed? First, let's have that call we were talking about. How > about 10am EST / 4pm CET, Monday, February 26? If anyone has an easy > way to set up a conference bridge, go ahead. If I hear nothing I'll > figure out how to set one up tomorrow. I have made a reservation for 10 people at that time on Zakim; the conference code is 26631, and I suggest we use #bpwg for that meeting. W3C Zakim: +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99 or +44.117.370.6152 http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim > The key questions, in my view, are: > > A. We have three relevant implementations (Dom's, .mobi, TAW). I've > gone off and started defining a fourth. Are we comfortable with that? > The fourth implementation's goal is to be independent of anyone's > particular usage or deployment, but, also conceivable usable by the > W3C and .mobi and TAW. As I said before, I'm happy to use any result that this group would produce and that would improve over the current situation for the W3C checker. > B. Ownership. Things get done when they have owners, and in software, > one architect is good. Agreed. > I have the time and willingness to drive this, > but, am concerned I won't fairly represent the design goals of > everyone (in particular regarding points 1 and 2 above.) So... who > else wants to work a lot on this and can start writing code? I personally don't think the current points of disagreements are such that they should prevent you from taking the lead on this - but that may be because I actually rather agree with you :) > C. Find a resolution to items 1, 2 and 3 above. > > D. Next milestone -- what can we do before the final release of > mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Sounds like a nice agenda for the call, indeed. Dom
Received on Monday, 26 February 2007 08:51:10 UTC