- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:29:55 -0400
- To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Cc: "Roland Gülle" <roland@7val.com>, public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
I guess I mean merely that the test that's always been called DEFAULT_INPUT_MODE On 8/30/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote: > Just to be clear on this, the warn and FAIL Ids have just been introduced in the latest Editors Draft ... so I am a bit worried that we are talking at crossed purposes ... > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sean Owen [mailto:srowen@google.com] > > Sent: 30 August 2007 15:16 > > To: Jo Rabin > > Cc: Roland Gülle; public-mobileok-checker > > Subject: Re: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf > > > > To be clear, if you mean the implementation should use exactly the > > same names as in the test document, yes. The document should not > > change to accommodate the tests, of course, since those identifiers > > have been in use in public drafts for a while. > > > > Sean > > > > On 8/30/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote: > > > > So the solution is to change the test and result names to the > > > > mobileOK basic doc style. > > > > Is this correct? > > > > > > > > > > I'm happy with that. > > > Jo >
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 17:30:30 UTC