- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:37:30 +0100
- To: Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com>
- Cc: "public-mobileok-checker" <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
> I like the short ID more than the actually IDs used in the tests. > My proposal is that Jo define the IDs in the mobileOK Basic doc and I > change them in the XSLT tests. I'm not short of things to do so am happy with the idea that you do the work! I suppose there is merit in the idea that the name of the test should be the same as the name of the relevant section of the document + a number, so that is another argument for doing it your way ... Jo > -----Original Message----- > From: Roland Gülle [mailto:roland@7val.com] > Sent: 30 August 2007 10:33 > To: Jo Rabin > Cc: public-mobileok-checker > Subject: Re: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf > > > It's a trivial change (the power of XSLT) for me to do the IDs per > > what you were expecting -i.e. make uppercase, remove the "test_" > > and change the _n to -n, so I will do that. > Great, so you will change the mobileOK Basic doc? > > Some tests have more differences: > AUTO_REFRESH_REDIRECTION > => auto_refresh > CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT_AND_VALID_MARKUP > => content_format_support > (I don't checked all) > > I like the short ID more than the actually IDs used in the tests. > My proposal is that Jo define the IDs in the mobileOK Basic doc and I > change them in the XSLT tests. > > Roland
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 09:37:48 UTC