- From: Laura Holmes <holmes@google.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:18:12 -0400
- To: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <135a9f560708190918s2627523bm3ef33bf954a6a210@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, I have a question regarding the spirit of some of the wording of the ContentFormatSupportAndValidMarkupTest. As it currently sits, the last item in the test states: For each included resource (see *2.3.6 Included Resources*<http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#included_resources> ): If the response specifies an Internet media type that is not "text/css", "image/jpeg" or "image/gif", *FAIL* If the Internet media type is "image/gif" or "image/jpeg", and the resource is not valid (see *2.3.9 Validity*<http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#validity>), *FAIL* If the Internet media type is "text/css" and the content is not valid CSS (see *2.3.9 Validity*<http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#validity>), *FAIL* However, i've found that I can actually embed some css text into an object tag within the markup of the primary document. Obviously, this is a fringe case, but I'm guessing we are testing for values of "text/css" in the context of it actually being provided as a stylesheet, in which case the external resource would be included in the <?xml-stylesheet.... tag or a link tag. Am I correct in assuming that we would want to put a FAIL on an externally referenced resource that is "text/css" when it isn't actually being used for style? In the case of embedding the text into the page with an object tag, it shows up just like a "text/html" object would - which according to the above test would result in a fail. The cases are so similar, I would imagine they would be treated the same. Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to assume that if an included resource is of type "text/css" and referenced from within the primary document, and is not referenced within the <?xml-stylesheet.... tag or link tag, it will produce a fail. Let me know your thoughts, Laura
Received on Sunday, 19 August 2007 16:18:27 UTC