MATF Minutes December 5, 2019

*MATF Minutes December 5, 2019

Link: https://www.w3.org/2019/12/05-mobile-a11y-minutes.html
* *
Text:*


  Mobile Accessibility Task Force Teleconference


    05 Dec 2019


    Attendees

Present
    Kim, Jennifer, Jake
Regrets

Chair
    Kimberly_Patch
Scribe
    Kim_Patch


    Contents

  * Topics <https://www.w3.org/2019/12/05-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#agenda>
  * Summary of Action Items
    <https://www.w3.org/2019/12/05-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#ActionSummary>
  * Summary of Resolutions
    <https://www.w3.org/2019/12/05-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary>


------------------------------------------------------------------------

[11:01] == Kim_Patch [~Kim_Patch@public.cloak] has joined #mobile-a11y 
[11:02] == laura [~laura@public.cloak] has joined #mobile-a11y [11:10] 
<Kim_Patch> 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouVFq4w-i0rchNHtTAG_JoRwHfYm9mN2MkxFBct1JSI/edit 
[11:10] == laura [~laura@public.cloak] has quit [laura] [11:11] 
<Kim_Patch> TOPIC: custom interactions [11:12] <Kim_Patch> Jake: the 
proposed SC text I completely changed, added a note, also cleaned up 
previous [CUT]

benefits, rewrote three paragraphs

Jake: first we need to have consensus on the new success criteria text
... I hope we solved two problems – first, what is custom, we turned it 
around to say what isn't custom, that makes it easier
... also standards and how to deal with it. If they can be used with the 
standard interactions than that one is also completely off the table

but it leaves us with two questions. The definition of what is standard. 
We talked about it last time but I would like to see if it's feasible. 
We need to know if it's possible before we work it out.

so if it seems valid we can continue to work it out

Jake: there's one thing we didn't solve now, but it's an interesting 
one. If you don't know there is a custom interaction how can you test it?
... I know Detlev brought it up and it is logical because your test 
procedure should be do everything humanly possible to see if there is 
something, but I'm not sure if that's always needed for Success 
criteria, because of that is so then you can never get it.
... so the test procedure is an interesting one – how do you know? You 
can look in the code or do we need to have another approach. We know 
there is an interaction which is not standard so it's custom let's see 
if it's documented – something like that.
... everything before user benefits is new – the SC, the four paragraphs

Reading the SC using suggesting mode

Jake: the most important part is the fourth paragraph in Benefits

Note – Forgot to start Trackbot at the start of the meeting, so I 
started it late and added the brief minutes.



-- 
___________________________________________________

Kimberly Patch
(617) 325-3966
kim@scriven.com <mailto:kim@scriven.com>

www.redstartsystems.com <http://www.redstartsystems.com>
- making speech fly

PatchonTech.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kimpatch>
@PatchonTech
www.linkedin.com/in/kimpatch <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kimpatch>
___________________________________________________