Belated regrets

Belated regrets, I was traveling today.
Detlev

> Am 08.11.2018 um 18:13 schrieb Kim Patch <kim@redstartsystems.com>:
> 
> MATF Minutes 8 September 2018 link: https://www.w3.org/2018/11/08-mobile-a11y-minutes.html <https://www.w3.org/2018/11/08-mobile-a11y-minutes.html>
> 
> Text of the minutes:
> Mobile Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
> 
> 08 Nov 2018
> 
> Attendees <>
> Present
> Kim, Kathy, Jake, Marcjohlic
> Regrets
> 
> Chair
> Kimberly_Patch
> Scribe
> kim
> Contents
> 
> Topics <https://www.w3.org/2018/11/08-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#agenda>
> Summary of Action Items <https://www.w3.org/2018/11/08-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#ActionSummary>
> Summary of Resolutions <https://www.w3.org/2018/11/08-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRAViPfAJ4Ytqc71tGZp6gU07HNd2QQaNgtJsog-D90/edit#gid=0 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRAViPfAJ4Ytqc71tGZp6gU07HNd2QQaNgtJsog-D90/edit#gid=0>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRAViPfAJ4Ytqc71tGZp6gU07HNd2QQaNgtJsog-D90/edit#gid=124994642 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRAViPfAJ4Ytqc71tGZp6gU07HNd2QQaNgtJsog-D90/edit#gid=124994642>
> Kathy: a lot of techniques will be done in the working group. Questions to task forces. Right now the idea is concentrate on the things that may be needed for 2.2 so we can evaluate whether or not it makes sense to do a 2.2 or continue with silver. Trying to keep ahead of where the working group is.. That's the task forces focus. Identifying the gap analysis.
> ... if we do find there are quite a few things we want to do we may want to create a document that have more of the user needs – small screen, touch, user interface. Coga is doing that right now. Things that didn't get in.
> ... for us a majority of things did get in and other documents we published are still significant. But we may want to do something like coga is doing.but that was the main decision out of TPAC – gap analysis to see what to do going forward. Also see that we are all working together to really look at framework that silver has put together. important for mobile
> ... when we move into silver will want to make sure that that framework works for mobile – doesn't have the same challenges we faced for 2.0 2.1 constraints. That some of the work coming up after we complete the gap analysis
> 
> Jake: gap analysis, see what's next – Why people may suffer from technical hurdles before deciding whether we do 2.2 or focus on silver. Need to know what's there, but we need to do, when we need to do it. If we need to deliver within a year 2.2.
> ... need to see what's left – I think we we do now is the best way – figure out what's left and seeing what new success criteria must be out there to help people
> 
> Plan to do that:
> 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRAViPfAJ4Ytqc71tGZp6gU07HNd2QQaNgtJsog-D90/edit#gid=0 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRAViPfAJ4Ytqc71tGZp6gU07HNd2QQaNgtJsog-D90/edit#gid=0>
> Read through published documents – resource tab lines 3 and four (bolded) to see what might be left out still – either new SCs or techniques that fit under existing SCs
> 
> Proposals go under the proposals tab – feel free to put entries in before the next meeting
> 
> We will pick up on the 15th going through those documents and filling in proposals and also looking back at the other resources
> 
> We want to find what we've previously talked about that might be left out, but new proposals are also welcome
> 
> Summary of Action Items <>
> Summary of Resolutions <>[End of minutes]
> Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm> version 1.154 (CVS log <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/>)
> $Date: 2018/11/08 17:09:10 $
>