MATF Minutes 7 November 2018

*MATF Minutes 7 September 2018 link: 
https://www.w3.org/2018/11/08-mobile-a11y-minutes.html*
*
Text of the minutes:*


  Mobile Accessibility Task Force Teleconference


    08 Nov 2018


    Attendees

Present
    Kim, Kathy, Jake, Marcjohlic
Regrets

Chair
    Kimberly_Patch
Scribe
    kim


    Contents

  * Topics <https://www.w3.org/2018/11/08-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#agenda>
  * Summary of Action Items
    <https://www.w3.org/2018/11/08-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#ActionSummary>
  * Summary of Resolutions
    <https://www.w3.org/2018/11/08-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary>


------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRAViPfAJ4Ytqc71tGZp6gU07HNd2QQaNgtJsog-D90/edit#gid=0

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRAViPfAJ4Ytqc71tGZp6gU07HNd2QQaNgtJsog-D90/edit#gid=124994642

Kathy: a lot of techniques will be done in the working group. Questions 
to task forces. Right now the idea is concentrate on the things that may 
be needed for 2.2 so we can evaluate whether or not it makes sense to do 
a 2.2 or continue with silver. Trying to keep ahead of where the working 
group is.. That's the task forces focus. Identifying the gap analysis.
... if we do find there are quite a few things we want to do we may want 
to create a document that have more of the user needs – small screen, 
touch, user interface. Coga is doing that right now. Things that didn't 
get in.
... for us a majority of things did get in and other documents we 
published are still significant. But we may want to do something like 
coga is doing.but that was the main decision out of TPAC – gap analysis 
to see what to do going forward. Also see that we are all working 
together to really look at framework that silver has put together. 
important for mobile
... when we move into silver will want to make sure that that framework 
works for mobile – doesn't have the same challenges we faced for 2.0 2.1 
constraints. That some of the work coming up after we complete the gap 
analysis

Jake: gap analysis, see what's next – Why people may suffer from 
technical hurdles before deciding whether we do 2.2 or focus on silver. 
Need to know what's there, but we need to do, when we need to do it. If 
we need to deliver within a year 2.2.
... need to see what's left – I think we we do now is the best way – 
figure out what's left and seeing what new success criteria must be out 
there to help people

Plan to do that:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRAViPfAJ4Ytqc71tGZp6gU07HNd2QQaNgtJsog-D90/edit#gid=0

Read through published documents – resource tab lines 3 and four 
(bolded) to see what might be left out still – either new SCs or 
techniques that fit under existing SCs

Proposals go under the proposals tab – feel free to put entries in 
before the next meeting

We will pick up on the 15th going through those documents and filling in 
proposals and also looking back at the other resources

We want to find what we've previously talked about that might be left 
out, but new proposals are also welcome


    Summary of Action Items


    Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's 
scribe.perl 
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm> 
version 1.154 (CVS log <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/>)
$Date: 2018/11/08 17:09:10 $