Re: Mobile Accessibility

Speaking as just one of many that contributed to this doc: 
I think we only covered those aspects that we felt required qualification of existing SCs or additional advice. Regarding text alternatives, there is no significant difference in mobile contexts that I can think of (but it is quite possible that there are things worth pointing out that we have simply missed).
Best,
Detlev

Sent from phone

> Am 19.10.2017 um 19:27 schrieb Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>:
> 
> FYI – a message about one of our documents from the interest group.
>  
> From: Joseph Yang [mailto:joesaiyang@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 7:07 PM
> To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Mobile Accessibility
>  
> Does anyone know why https://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-accessibility-mapping/ doesn't mention certain WCAG 2.0 requirements like text alternatives but will mention contrast, and keyboard accessibility? 
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Joe