Re: New SC relating to notifications of content change (was Re: Some thinking around the orientation discussion)

In my scenarios there would not be a change if context, just a change of content.

P
--
Patrick H. Lauke


> On 6 May 2016, at 17:35, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think this relates to both these SC as well...........
> 
> 3.2.1 On Focus: When any component receives focus, it does not initiate a change of context. (Level A)
> 
> 3.2.2 On Input: Changing the setting of any user interface component does not automatically cause a change of context unless the user has been advised of the behavior before using the component. (Level A)
> 
> ​​​​​
> 
> 
> 
> * katie *
> 
> Katie Haritos-Shea 
> Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
> 
> Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] 
> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 11:20 AM
> To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org; GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Cc: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
> Subject: Re: New SC relating to notifications of content change (was Re: Some thinking around the orientation discussion)
> 
>> On 06/05/2016 15:56, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>> 
>> I think this is essential - but I think it is already covered.
> 
> Where? Under which SC would this fall? To clarify, this is not (I think)
> 4.1.2 as that SC relates to updating/notifying user of change to interactive elements/controls (so that if their status changes, or their actual function/label, that this is done in a way that then conveys the change programmatically to users), not about changes in the overall document/structure/content elsewhere on the page.
> 
>> If not - then it would need to be clarified in connection with 
>> conformance rather than as another SC.
>> If this isn’t obvious/clear already (and evidently it isnt) then  I 
>> THINK it could be clarified in Understanding WCAG 2.0 — and be done 
>> immediately with the next publication of that document.
>> 
>>  I and Loretta and David and others can confirm that it was the 
>> intent and understanding of the group that if it changed - it should 
>> remain accessible.
>> 
>> 
>> does this help?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> /gregg/
> 
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
> 
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 6 May 2016 16:48:18 UTC