- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 17:14:53 +0100
- To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org
Just before I forget, some stream of consciousness (probably to be added to the wiki). Problem is twofold: * content that expects a certain aspect ratio/orientation to function (e.g. a page which "wants" user to view it in landscape - if user has a portrait aspect ratio, all they get is a "hey, resize your window / tilt your device into landscape mode" message) * content which goes a step further and locks/forces a particular aspect ratio/orientation (possible in native and, with proposals like https://drafts.csswg.org/css-device-adapt/#orientation-desc, also for web content) While all users are potentially affected by these, certain users groups with disabilities are particularly affected as they can't easily just "turn their device" (thinking of users with a fixed tablet attached to a wheelchair, in landscape mode only). For web content, desktop browsers don't currently honour any of the device adaptation / viewport directives - this is currently only an issue on "mobile" (phone/tablet) devices. It's possible this distinction may fall away in future (indeed, under certain conditions, even desktop browsers take hints from viewport directives (as is the case with IE/Edge in Windows "metro"/"modern" mode when using split screen view, which picks up on some viewport stuff [don't have the details handy just now]) The more naive "check for aspect ratio width/height and show a 'resize/tilt' message" situations will affect desktop users as much as mobile/tablet users. In essence, we'd want to say: let users experience your content/use your site/app regardless of their aspect ratio/orientation, as not everybody can easily change window size/orientation. Simplest way to achieve this: don't fight the browser; using responsive approaches to then make your content look/work great regardless of orientation/aspect ratio is not necessarily tied to this - it's an optional/extra. This should be primarily about NOT locking users out completely. whether the stuff then works well in both portrait and landscape is more of a usability issue. Another sufficient technique would then be the "mechanism" as in "provide a switch, or setting in an options dialog, or similar". P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2016 16:17:34 UTC