public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org from June 2016 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2016

• RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Jonathan Avila
• RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Jonathan Avila
• RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Jonathan Avila
• RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Jonathan Avila
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• MATF Minutes 30 June 2016 Kim Patch
• RE: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 30 ALAN SMITH
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 30 Henny Swan
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative only when compliance cannot be accomplished? (was Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop) David MacDonald
• Re[2]: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Detlev Fischer
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 30 Patrick H. Lauke

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

• Re: Conforming alternative only when compliance cannot be accomplished? (was Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop) David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative only when compliance cannot be accomplished? (was Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop) John Foliot
• Conforming alternative only when compliance cannot be accomplished? (was Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• a degraded experience (was Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop) John Foliot
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop John Foliot
• RE: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Jonathan Avila
• RE: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) John Foliot
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• RE: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Jonathan Avila
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) John Foliot
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald

Tuesday, 28 June 2016

• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) John Foliot
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop John Foliot
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Jonathan Avila
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop ALAN SMITH
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop John Foliot
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop John Foliot
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop ALAN SMITH
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop ALAN SMITH
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop John Foliot
• Re: Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view Jonathan Avila
• Re: Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view John Foliot
• Re: Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view Jonathan Avila
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop John Foliot
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald
• Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view David MacDonald
• Desktop view should not be conforming alternative to mobile view David MacDonald
• Re: Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Patrick H. Lauke

Monday, 27 June 2016

• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering successcriteria for WCAG 2.1) Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering successcriteria for WCAG 2.1) ALAN SMITH
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) ALAN SMITH
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) John Foliot
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) John Foliot
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) David MacDonald
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) John Foliot
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) John Foliot
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) David MacDonald
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 30 Chris McMeeking
• Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 30 Kim Patch
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) David MacDonald
• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Patrick H. Lauke

Sunday, 26 June 2016

• Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Patrick H. Lauke
• Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Tools/resources we use (meta-discussion) Patrick H. Lauke

Thursday, 23 June 2016

• Quick (hopefully) question about WCAG 2 glossary definition of "keyboard interface" Patrick H. Lauke
• MATF Minutes 23 June 2016 Kim Patch
• mobile-ACTION-55: Update github version http://w3c.github.io/mobile-a11y-extension/ to include pointer, add definition of coarse/fine etc as per mq lvl 4 etc Mobile Accessibility Task Force Issue Tracker
• Tools/resources we use (meta-discussion) Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda June 23 ALAN SMITH
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda June 23 Henny Swan
• Re: mobile-ACTION-54: Take first stab at generalising https://www.w3.org/wai/gl/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/guideline_2.6:_make_it_easier_to_use_the_physical_features_of_the_phone.#proposed_guideline_2.6 in light of his proposal Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: mobile-ACTION-53: Try and come up with some non-pointer/pointer/fancy touch definition Patrick H. Lauke

Tuesday, 21 June 2016

• Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda June 23 Kathy Wahlbin

Thursday, 16 June 2016

• RE: MATF Minutes 16 June 2016 ALAN SMITH
• MATF Minutes 16 June 2016 Kim Patch
• mobile-ACTION-54: Take first stab at generalising https://www.w3.org/wai/gl/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/guideline_2.6:_make_it_easier_to_use_the_physical_features_of_the_phone.#proposed_guideline_2.6 in light of his proposal Mobile Accessibility Task Force Issue Tracker
• mobile-ACTION-53: Try and come up with some non-pointer/pointer/fancy touch definition Mobile Accessibility Task Force Issue Tracker
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 16 Alistair Garrison
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 16 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 16 David MacDonald
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 16 Henny Swan

Wednesday, 15 June 2016

• Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 16 Kim Patch

Friday, 10 June 2016

• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 9 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 9 David MacDonald

Thursday, 9 June 2016

• How to write Success Criteria David MacDonald
• Draft minutes - Mobile A11y Task Force call Thursday, June 9 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 9 Henny Swan
• RE: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 9 Kathy Wahlbin
• RE: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 9 ALAN SMITH
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 9 Alistair Garrison

Wednesday, 8 June 2016

• Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 9 Kim Patch

Thursday, 2 June 2016

• Re: Draft minutes for 2 June 2016 teleconference David MacDonald
• Draft minutes for 2 June 2016 teleconference Jonathan Avila
• mobile-ACTION-52: Send revision of 2.6.1 to list. Mobile Accessibility Task Force Issue Tracker
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 2 Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 2 Chris McMeeking
• Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 2 ALAN SMITH
• Re: Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 2 Detlev Fischer
• Mobile A11y Task Force Agenda Thursday, June 2 Kim Patch

Wednesday, 1 June 2016

• RE: Device manipulation Jonathan Avila

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2016 23:07:15 UTC