Re: Perhaps we can follow the LVTF and close a few of our proposals

I'll perhaps remind us that we have a first public working draft due in 12
weeks, and there are 63 SC proposed.

If initiative is not taken, nothing will happen...and there is always the
risk when one takes initiative that it will be misunderstood.

Anyway... I'd love to see you on theTuesday calls.

I'll drop this initiative and get back to my paying clients.



Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 10/12/2016 12:09, David MacDonald wrote:
>
>> Sounds like there is not consensus on closing:
>> - 61 Pointer Gestures,  62 Keyboard with AT, 64 Concurrent Input
>> Mechanisms
>>
>> So we'll leave them open, and let the larger group deal with them.
>>
>
> With respect David...can we leave decisions to the TF chairs please?
>
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>