Re: Perhaps we can follow the LVTF and close a few of our proposals

Sorry the non interference one is #71

- Issue 71 Non- Interference of AT
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/7
<https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72>1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:22 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> Hi All
>
> The LVTF has reviewed their submitted issues and closed 5 of them. So they
> have gone from 14 to 9 submitted SCs to the larger WG. Perhaps we can take
> a similar initiative to close several of our 14. Any work we can do at the
> TF level to tighten up our list, will help the Working Group, given that
> there are currently 63 Proposed SCs and many will have to be dropped. I
> would like to propose we close some of the less mature ones unless some of
> us feel strongly that they:
>
> - Can be cleaned up to meet the acceptance requirements of a Success
> Criteria https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteri
> - Will help significant numbers of people with disabilities overcome a
> known barrier
> - Can be tested reasonably easily
> - Can be accomplished clearly and easily by devs
>
> I've closed out Issue #3 which was M16
>
> I propose we close the following:
>
> - Issue 61 Pointer Gestures
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/61
>
>
> - Issue 62 Keyboard with AT (that remaps key input)
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/62
>
> - Issue 64 Concurrent Input Mechanisms
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/64
>
> - Issue 72 Non- Interference of AT
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72
>
> To my mind most of these are mostly covered in the standard, do not
> promise to make huge differences in the lives of people with disabilities,
> and would require bandwidth we don't have to bring up to the level of the
> others. This will save us, and the group about 100 hours, literally, and would
> leave us with 10 tight mature SC submissions and will help set an example
> for COGA to follow LVTF and MATF in closing some issues.
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>