- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:31:00 -0500
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Cc: "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxzOxrxviQ1z52_af_fmQd0PrReKsXn-v8yFRVSQSWyZYA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi David, MATF, Just a quick touch-back regarding "pixel". Is the TF aware of this research/problem: - A pixel is not a pixel is not a pixel - http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/04/a_pixel_is_not.html - PPK's video on the same topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wscVOXjIzQ - A Pixel Identity Crisis: http://alistapart.com/article/a-pixel-identity-crisis FWIW JF On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:17 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: > The feeling of the the mobile task force is that our touch size SC should > include a minimum size for a pointer/mouse target in addition to touch. We're > not sure what that minimum should be, whether it should be the same 44px as > the touch or smaller. It was the end of the call so were were not able to > flesh this out sufficiently... Os I'm creating a discussion here. If there > is momentum I'll set up a WIKI page. There is some discussion about how > would the author know the what is activating the control on responsive > sites that share icons for touch AND pointer. The current wording is. > 2.5.4 Target Size: A touch target > <https://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-Extension/#def-touch-target> is at > least 44px by 44px of the visible display at the default viewport size. > (Level AA) > What about this amendment, If it's an ok construct, then what value should > be for the pointer minimum size. > 2.5.4 Target Size: A touch target > <https://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-Extension/#def-touch-target> is at > least 44px by 44px and the pointer/mouse target is at least <x pixels> by > <y pixels> of the visible display at the default viewport size. (Level AA) > -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Consultant Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 16:31:29 UTC