- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:06:45 +0100
- To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org
On 19/04/2016 20:56, David MacDonald wrote: > If that's the way it reads, that is not the intention. Here is the > pseudo language. > > When stuff can be done with event up then one of following is true > > * do the thing that can be done (use event up) > * otherwise have fallbacks (2 bullets points) > * other wise it shouldn't be done because its a spacegun, or piano > etc....... > > Do you have a suggestion to improve the language ... This would probably take it quite a few steps back in the discussion, but something more along the lines of: 2.5.3 Avoid accidental activation: for single touch and/or pointer activation, at least one of the following is true: - activation is on the "up" event (either explicitly, or using the platform's generic activation/click event) - a mechanism is available to allow the user to define which action (e.g. "down" or "up" event") triggers activation - confirmation is provided, which can dismiss activation - activation is reversible - exception: when timing of activation is essential and waiting for the up-event would invalidate the activity P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 20:07:02 UTC