- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 16:47:18 +0100
- To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org
On 01/04/2016 16:40, Chris McMeeking wrote: > You're correct, it is very relevant. However, not when considering > whether a success criteria is a criteria or not. But, whether or not > such a criteria is enforced on a given platform in a given situation, > etc. If you want to go out there and test every criteria against all > combinations of browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Internet Explorer (6, > 7, 8, 9)) against all possible ATs (Jaws, NVDA, VoiceOver, ChromeVox, > TalkBack, VoiceOver (iOS)) you are never going to have 100% compliance. > Are you suggesting we scrap all of WCag because nobody can possible conform? No, and exactly because there are UAAG that help to try to set the bar for AT/UAs and what they should do. Otherwise sure, put the onus on the Web Content developer and see how much they'll care for guidelines that mandate things that they can't influence/code against. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 1 April 2016 15:47:43 UTC