- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 19:24:05 +0100
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- CC: "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
On 31/08/2015 22:02, David MacDonald wrote: > *Patrick: *As said, when touch AT is running, all gestures are > intercepted by the AT at the moment (unless you mean taps?). And only > iOS, to my knowledge, has a passthrough gesture (which is not > announced/exposed to users, so a user would have to guess that if they > tried it, something would then happen). > > *David:* All gestures are intercepted. But all standard gestures are > replaced, unless the author does something dumb to break that. I think > we need to, at a minimum ensure that standard replacement gestures are > not messed uo. I think it's critical to define what you mean by "standard gesture" then. As noted, later in the document I infer that a "tap" also falls under the definition of "gesture", but this is counter-intuitive to me and many devs. > > For instance: I recently tested a high profile app for a major sports > event. It had a continuous load feature like twitter that kept > populating as you scroll down with one finger. Turn on the VoiceOver and > try the 3 finger equivalent of a swipe and nothing happens to populate > the page. The Blind user has hit a brick wall. I think we have to ensure > this type of thing doesn't happen on WCAG conforming things. So scrolling is also a gesture? Again, I would not talk about it in those terms. A gesture to me is a swipe, pinch, rotation. Taps, scrolling, etc should be clearly identified as such, IMHO.-- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2015 18:24:30 UTC