- From: Marc Johlic <marc.johlic@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:20:45 -0400
- Cc: "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, "jimallan@tsbvi.edu" <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, "Kelly Ford (Kelly.Ford@microsoft.com)" <Kelly.Ford@microsoft.com>
- Message-ID: <CABpp2mKGcj1Bgf-8dr_X7fAVjhCZ5aHSvcZRNSmiYC4D9Lo9fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Trackbot was not started, but here is the IRC log: scribe: marcjohlic Kathy http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/Technique_Development_Assignments KW: Review technique assignments - how are people doing? Does anyone need any help with anything? KW: Don't need to use GitHub - feel free to send techniques over in another format if needed KW: Anyone plan to have any done for next week? HS: Expect to - got sidetracked in GitHub MJ: Assumed it's OK to submit partial techniques that may need some of the areas fleshed out? KW: Yes - we can then either work as a group to flesh out the ideas - or pair folks up to work on finishing the technique DM: Is everyone getting assigned techniques? Kathy http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/Technique_Development_Assignments KW: Yes, listed on Technique Development page KW: Feel free to edit this page and mark any that you want to tackle - or if you come up with any that we might be missing, add those. DM: OK, I see I'm signed up for a couple Kathy https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/66524/20150717_survey/results TOPIC: Survey Kathy http://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-TF-Note/Techniques/M002 TOPIC: Providing adequate touch target size / Ensuring that touch targets are large enough to touch accurately without magnification KW: Take a few minutes to read over M002 and we'll discuss KW: Let's talk about touch target size and what we should be recommending in here KW: Currently we have 9 mm x 9 mm HS: I went through Android and came up w/ 9 x 9 - and in some independent user studies came up with the same thing HS: We looked at all the different forms of guidance out there and came up with 9 x 9 MJ: Just trying to understand how this plays out on all devices - tablets to wearables - I guess the fingertip size stays the same, so that's why this makes sense? KW: Do we need to explain a bit more on how / why we came up with 9x9? DM: Yes, we have quite a bit of this type of information in 1.4.3 Contrast (minimum) - to back up the findings HS: There is some proprietary information in the BBC guidance. At the moment it's not publishable, but can check to see if there is a willingness to share with the group and make it public KW: We need to add in some more language and references as to how we came up w/ the 9 mm x 9 mm number HS: For the Test Procedures - how do you go about actually measuring this, because you may have something that is actually smaller than 9x9, but has a target area around it that meets the 9x9 Jan: I was thinking about the clearances as well - so when you say there is a clearance around it I see two possibilities: 1) white space around it that when touched does not do anything at all and 2) area around it that when touched goes to the same place HS: Yes, more 2 - where the area around it would go to the same place Jan: Test procedure was to have the focus borders come on - and to measure around those. Using VO or something that forces a visual indicator around the area HS: So maybe we have something that talks about measuring on a desktop vs on a touch screen - and then have a statement that this testing is done during the design phase KW: How does this get measured in the design phase? HS: Via tools that are in apps such as Photoshop etc - and then added into the style guide KW: If we go down this path, we'll be defining test procedures per devices - any issues with that? HS: Could talk about whether device gives a border or not KW: Do we know if the border that VO provides actually is the border - or if it expands it? Jan: iOS only has a keyboard interface when VO is on, but Android has keyboard interface w/o Talkback KW: We could add some description on why a screen reader may be needed for this testing Jan +1 to KW KW: NOTE - we should remove screen reader reference in the User Agent notes KW: Also didn't think the information about the top strip on iOS device really belonged in here because we're talking about web content. This is a technique for web developers and they have not control over that. KW: NOTE - Recommendation is to remove those non-web references from the technique KW: NOTE - refer to survey responses for further comments, suggestions, feedback, changes, edits Kathy http://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-TF-Note/Techniques/M003 TOPIC: MOO3 - 2. Activating elements via the touchend event KW: Take a few mins to review KW: Several comments in the survey. Alan entered an example about touch target being too close. Mike had some recommendations on Test procedures Jan: There are other actions that cause response - such as click - so naming it after specific events are we ruling others out? Jan: Is it too specific? Jan: Should this be limited to actions that cause change of context? Jan: Should the same advice apply to keydown vs keyup? Jan: I did a bit of testing on my Gmail app - tends to respond on down - so there's one way you could interact similar to the old mouse menus where you could touch and drag down. So if it didn't do that - and only shows on the up event it would rule those out HS: I can go back through this one in more detail - just know that it is a very big problem for users KW: Maybe we can come back and discuss this one next week. Kim will be back and others will have more time to look at it. KW: Any other thoughts or feedback on this one? Other research we shoudl look into? KW: OK - will leave this one open and will look into again next week -END MEETING- On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Kathy Wahlbin <kathyw@ia11y.com> wrote: > The next Mobile A11y Taskforce meeting will be this *Thursday, **July 16 > at **11 AM Eastern* (Length: 1 hour). > > Join WebEx meeting > <https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m36e276cbbba4f49bc8acfb0899805033> > > Meeting number: 646 316 248 > > Meeting password: Please obtain your meeting password from your > host. > > Join by phone > *+1-617-324-0000 <%2B1-617-324-0000>* US Toll Number > Access code: 646 316 248 > > *Agenda:* > > 1. Status of writing techniques > > *2. *Survey - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/66524/20150717_survey/ *Please > take some time and respond to the survey prior to the meeting.* > > > > Thanks! > > > > Kathy & Kim > > Mobile Accessibility Taskforce Facilitators > > > > > *Kathleen Wahlbin *CEO & Founder > > > *Interactive Accessibility* > *T* (978) 443-0798 *C* (978) 760-0682 *E* kathyw@ia11y.com > > www.InteractiveAccessibility.com > <http://www.interactiveaccessibility.com/> > > *The Accessibility ExpertsTM* > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2015 17:21:14 UTC