Poll on Android talkback

http://inclusiveandroid.com/?q=content%2Fresults-march-2015-poll-where-talkback-development-should-be-focused&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter


Cheers,

David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

www.Can-Adapt.com



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Kathy Wahlbin <kathyw@ia11y.com> wrote:

>  http://www.w3.org/2015/04/02-mobile-a11y-minutes.html  Mobile
> Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 02 Apr 2015
>
> Agenda
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobile-a11y-tf/2015Mar/0029.html>
>
> See also: IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2015/04/02-mobile-a11y-irc>
>  Attendees
>
> *Present*
>
> *Kathy_Wahlbin, Detlev, Alan_Smith, Marc_Johlic, Jeanne, Mike_Pluke, Jan,
> [IPcaller], AWK, +1.408.425.aaaa*
>
> *Regrets*
>
> *Kim, David*
>
> *Chair*
>
> *Kathy*
>
> *Scribe*
>
> *alan*
>  Contents
>
>    - Topics <http://www.w3.org/2015/04/02-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#agenda>
>
>  1.   New time for meeting
> <http://www.w3.org/2015/04/02-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#item01>
>
> 2.   Survey <http://www.w3.org/2015/04/02-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#item02>
>
> 3.   Touch Target Size and Spacing
> <http://www.w3.org/2015/04/02-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#item03>
>
>    - Summary of Action Items
>    <http://www.w3.org/2015/04/02-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#ActionSummary>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> <*trackbot*> Date: 02 April 2015
>
> <*Kathy*> meeting: Mobile A11Y TF
>
> <*Detlev*> I put in 6283 as pass code but Zakim tells mie it is not
> valid...
>
> <*scribe*> scribe:alan
>
> takeup next
>
> <*HennyS*> I'm unable to access the conference bridge. I just get static
> feedback.
>  New time for meeting
>
> <*Detlev*> worked now
>
> one item on on the agenda is first item is taking about new time for this
> meeting.
>
> many interested in joining but in asia but this time is difficult
>
> can we have it earlier in the day or other creative solutions?
>
> Jeanne, anyone on west cost?
>
> <*Jan*> JR: I can do do as early as 9am ET
>
> <*Detlev*> What would be the new time suggestion?
>
> Kathy, yes one person.
>
> + Alan for earlier
>
> Mike Shivanik is on west coast
>
> can we do survey?
>
> David McDonald has conflict with this exact time. Only can join every
> other week.
>
> Mark, 9-2 on thursdays is okay
>
> I think Jan said okay with Thursday mornings
>
> <*Detlev*> should we have a scribe?
>
> Kathy suggested two diff times for meetings for techniques. Review
> meetings at specific times.
>
> <*Detlev*> Ah - overlooked that, sorry.
>
> Review meetings to two different times?
>
> Asian request for Beijing
>
> currently 11:13 pm for them.
>
> Mike Shebanek is on west coast usa
>
> Difficult challenge for this with people in different countries. Starts to
> get to be where time of day is barrier.
>
> Call for concensus on list and not on calls.
>
> Who is speaking? sorry
>
> Andrew, thanks
>
> Trying to be more asinchroneous.
>
> Consensus in list rather than in meetings.
>
> Yes, I know.
>
> Jan, hard when you have some that go to one meeting and some to another.
>
> <*AWK_*> There is a lot of value in being able to thrash topics out on
> the phone, but the CFC process on the list is more inclusive
>
> Move to making sure we do concensous through the list via survey or others.
>
> <*Kathy*> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/66524/20150330_survey/results
>
> *jakim:* next item
>  Survey
>
> Started on operable.
>
> <*Kathy*> TOPCI: 1. 3.1 Keyboard Control for Touchscreen Devices
>
> discuss different one, any missing, have people walk through their
> suggestions.
>
> 3.1 Keyboard control for touchscreen devices
>
> Reviewing each response.
>
> don't need to be in WCAG but anything new as well.
>
> Touch and mouse control also important
>
> Mouse could be other device as well.
>
> Detlev, perhaps pointer control.
>
> for example mouse
>
> Kathy also taking notes of comments.
>
> for touch devices in brackets (using touch and keyboard)
>
> David made comment on not seing keyboard trap and do we need discussion of
> drag and drop.
>
> <*jeanne*> I agree that we need keyboard trap
>
> Kathy did see trap recently, so it is important
>
> detlev; are we also talking about keyboard and screen readers and swipe?
>
> <*marcjohlic*> I also agree that we need to address keyboard trap (or
> trap in general)
>
> Kathy, touch and pointer control also not being trapped for touch.
>
> Is opporability is better wording?
>
> Ensuring touch access control for all functionality' sounds more like it
> should be associated to 3.3 Touchscreen Gestures as 3.1 focuses on keyboard
> operability.
>
> "Defining the hover, focus, selected and touch (regular, long) states":
> these states mostly have a platform-specific implementation so what should
> the content author define here apart from adequate visible focus (SC
> 2.4.7)? This might be rendered as "Use focus, hover and select states
> consistently and in a way that follows the respective platform
> conventions", or similar.
>
> Kathy, only thing worried about neet to have focus state that is visible.
>
> May need to clarify further, have behaviors of all the ways we interact.
>
> hover, and other have the affordance that something is there.
>
> *Mike:* trap issue.
>
> <*Mike_Pluke*> where input focus can be moved to a user interface
> element, it shall be possible to move the input focus away from that
> element using the same mechanism, in order to avoid trapping the input focus
>
> Mike could not get his results entered.
>
> Kathy saw this this morning, not sure what is going on with survey.
>
> His comments are in there, no worries.
>
> Kathy when we are looking at keyboard or touch. Kim would share on voice
> control if on call. More for UAG site.
>
> Anything we should say or include for other ways people are interacting?
>
> *Andrew:* how to plan for a good voice interaction model.
>
> sumarizing for action.
>
> Sorry, that was Mike
>
> Kathy would we group voice with touch ?
>
> Or specific techniques for switch.
>
> Jan, can emulate both.
>
> Jeanne, likes idea of addressing switch directly.
>
> Give the appearance of not addressing it otherwise.
>
> Have section for "other"
>
> Kathy, what if touch, point and other input devices
>
> Jan, not quite sure about this.
>
> What is keyboard is sequential, touch is ability for random access. Voice
> is another random access method
>
> Into the ui even with out actual button there.
>
> Alan, keyboard can also do next paragraph, sentence, etc.
>
> Jan, this is an access issue
>
> Mode, is a radial thing.
>
> Voice we can do voice sequeential and randomly.
>
> Kathy put this into three groups in document.
>
> any techniques for random and seq.
>
> Not putting notes on wiki put on seperate word doc.
>
> Detlev, may get things not focusable.
>
> Kathy what about grouping, and how people actually access it.
>
> Jan, still seq. but hierarcial. Are you asking about random?
>
> Kathy, any technique in voice or switch we need to have in here?
>
> Jan, when a switch emulates a mouse, button size is still important.
>
> May not be something to address here. Will think about this more. will
> look at a whole later.
>  Touch Target Size and Spacing
>
> next item is 2.3.2
>
> Providing adequate touch target size / Ensuring that touch targets are
> large enough to touch accurately without magnification Provide adequate
> spacing between touch targets
>
> Jan talking about his comment: Another maybe advisory thing is to provide
> a viewer showing what's under the finger in apps taking path input (maybe
> that's for the touch/mouse section)
>
> Many apps these days you want to do fine work.
>
> One technique is a viewer under your finger.
>
> Kathy to go under touch and pointer control.
>
> Kathy, goes with Mikes point on affordance.
>
> Alans comment on zoom maginication when touching close to a link button.
>
> Mikes comment: Touch target is not defined. It is not uncommon to use
> software to disambiguate the intended touch target. In such a case the
> concept of spacing between touch targets is difficult to define. Also, the
> visible target can be quite small (e.g. a down arrow) as long as it is
> sufficiently far away from other active controls.
>
> really talking about area inwhich the actual area where you touch the
> control.
>
> What are talking about with touch target. area in which you touch it it
> activates a specific control.
>
> Detlev, area that activates the target,
>
> Much larger area that actually activates the target. Or little area you
> see.
>
> Jan, agrees. To him, the surrounding area is still the touch target.
>
> Provide adequate spacing, the space in between is inactive.
>
> When targest are small inactive area is more important.
>
> Need to be careful of sugesting spacing.
>
> More concerned that when you touch an element you don't activate the wrong
> one you did not want to touch.
>
> Provide adequate spacing between elements. Have two items on this.
>
> Mike, avoided putting size and spacing in european guidelines.
>
> There are minimum sizes defined in dev docs for ios and android.
>
> <*jeanne*> UAAG says they have to follow dev docs.
>
> Mike is okay with have both.
>
> *detlev:* on his comments for touch: better to say imput mode independent.
>
> <*jeanne*> UAAG SC on following dev docs ->
> http://w3c.github.io/UAAG/UAAG20/#sc_512
>
> One technique avoid techniques when screen reader is turned on some dont
> work.
>
> Provide fall back to drag and drop
>
> fall back for delete icon via drag and drop to trash can.
>
> Alan, is that same as keyboard equiv for all touch
>
> detlev; may have long press and delete key may not be mutually exclusive.
>
> kathy, any more.
>
> Device gesture 3.3.3
>
> Jan, wording needs to be explained, using device buttons are rair on
> things.
>
> actually going over 4. 3.4 Device Manipulation Gestures
>
> *David:* might need to rename the second technique to make it clearer...
> I'm bouncing between arrow on a keyboard and home button on device in my
> mind.
>
> Are these hard or soft buttons?
>
> Things like android back button.
>
> Is this software or hard key?
>
> Jan, considers this a hardware key.
>
> <*scribe*> new android 5 active actually has hardware keys for these that
> are soft on other devices.
>
> Some use this for other functions, and actions are not consistance.
>
> Jan, same within device useage.
>
> any last comments?:
>
> Kathy will put wiki page together for these notes.
>
> Will create survey for next week for list of techniques.
>
> Kathy thanks and bye.
>
> rssagent make minutes
>
> rssagent, make minutes
>  Summary of Action Items
>
> [End of minutes]
>  ------------------------------
>  Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl
> <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm> version
> 1.140 (CVS log <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/>)
> $Date: 2015/04/02 16:03:48 $
> ------------------------------
>  Scribe.perl diagnostic output
>
> [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
>
> This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140  of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30
>
> Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/
>
>
>
> Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)
>
>
>
> No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: Alan_Smith
>
> Found Scribe: alan
>
> Default Present: Kathy_Wahlbin, Detlev, Alan_Smith, Marc_Johlic, Jeanne, Mike_Pluke, Jan, [IPcaller], AWK, +1.408.425.aaaa
>
> Present: Kathy_Wahlbin Detlev Alan_Smith Marc_Johlic Jeanne Mike_Pluke Jan [IPcaller] AWK +1.408.425.aaaa
>
> Regrets: Kim David
>
> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobile-a11y-tf/2015Mar/0029.html
>
> Found Date: 02 Apr 2015
>
> Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/04/02-mobile-a11y-minutes.html
>
> People with action items:
>
>
>
> WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
>
> You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.
>
>
>
>
>
> [End of scribe.perl
> <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm> diagnostic
> output]
>

Received on Sunday, 5 April 2015 19:40:44 UTC