- From: David Todd <dltodd@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:54:19 -0400
- To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF7B0E0F94.38F04FD7-ON85257CA9.00519A1E-85257CA9.0051E0E0@us.ibm.com>
Minutes: http://www.w3.org/2014/03/28-mobile-a11y-minutes.html
W3C
- DRAFT -
Mobile Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
28 Mar 2014
Agenda
See also: IRC log
Attendees
Present
Kim_Patch, Kathy_Wahlbin, kathleen, +1.720.663.aaaa, Jon_Avila,
Alan_Smith, DavidTodd, wuwei, Jeanne, Jan
Regrets
Chair
Kimberly_Patch
Scribe
DavidTodd
Contents
Topics
1. Update from WCAG 2.0 meeting at CSUN regarding technique
development
Summary of Action Items
<trackbot> Date: 28 March 2014
<AlanSmith> Have my other call to be on so I'm double listening for a
while.
Update from WCAG 2.0 meeting at CSUN regarding technique development
Kathy & Jeanne at CSUN
Kathy reporting on WCAG meeting @ CSUN.
Kathy: One topic was how to write to write techs. for WCAG.
<Kathy> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Writing_WCAG_Techniques_-_Notes
Kathy: There is a wiki page on how to write techs.
... recommend we read "how to".
<Kathy> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Technique_Template
Kathy: There is a template for writing techs.
... recommends reviewing techs. template.
... easier to use wiki for writing techs.
Kim: How to stay coordinated with other groups?
<AlanSmith> I've book marked them and will look at them
Kathy: Create a work plan to document what we are going to do.
... 2 things are underway (gap analysis and BBC review).
... When finished reviewing techniques send a note to the group so we can
start reviewing as a group.
... There are number of ways to present mobile guidance in the techniques.
Kim: 2 things that need to be done. Common failures and last part of
general techniques.
John will do 1 - 20 of common failures.
Kim & Kathy: Keep in mind both native and hybrid apps when reviewing
techniques.
Kathleen: Silverlight not supported on mobile.
<Kathy> Here are the assignments
<Kathy> Jonathan Avila Common Failures: F52-F89
<Kathy> Kathleen Anderson CSS Techniques: C23-C30
<Kathy> David Todd General Techniques: G101-G150
<Kathy> Kathleen Wahlbin Common Failures: F1-F50
<Kathy> Kimberly Patch FLASH: FLASH 1-36
<Kathy> Alan Smith General Techniques: G151-G202
Jon: Should we add notes about html specific topics?
Kim: yes
Kathy: Ways we can present mobile accessibility techniques and changes to
understanding documents so people get the information they need.
<Jan_> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/
Jan: Makes sense to have a mobile techs. page that pulls everything in one
place.
Kathy: How to deal with the different technologies?
<jon_avila> There may also be some general mobile technqiues
Jeanne: There are disadvantages to having separate techniques (e.g.,
maintenance)
Kim: Thinks a separate document would be good.
Kathy: What do we think from a developer perspective?
<jon_avila> Right, people may be using responsive design
<Zakim> jeanne, you wanted to say that a separate mobile techniques section
would solve the problem of duplicating work in other groups
Jan: Support the notion that WCAG is the appropriate guideline.
kathleen: would like to work with one document rather that two.
<Jan_> Jan: The mobile native technaiwues should be their own sections of
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/
<Jan_> Jan: Would like to see a "Mobile HTML" section of
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/
<Jan_> Jan: Then there could be cross-references from "Desktop HTML" to
matching "Mobile HTML" section and vice versa
Jon: General & HTML guidelines that work in mobile we should reference.
<Jan_> Jon: People will be using "responsive web design"
<jon_avila> The reason I was saying something might not apply is because
it's not accessibility supported on mobile.
Kathleen: Add additional sections to existing techs?
<jon_avila> survey?
<Jan_> Jan: Since what is accessibility supported changes over time, notes
to that effect should be "soft"
Kathy: yes, or could incorporate other models.
Kim: Create a wiki page with different models.
Kathy: schedule people to present what they have done.
... Decide on a direction in the next couple of weeks.
... Get feedback in a controlled manner.
Kim: Next time we will have list of models and then walk through completed
work.
Kathy: Think about the techs. that address keyboard.
<Kathy>
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/Keyboard_Access/Modality_Independent_Control/IndieUI
There is a summary page of keyboard issues from WCAG meeting.
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.138 (CVS log)
$Date: 2014-03-28 14:48:38 $
Scribe.perl diagnostic output
[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/
Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)
No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: DavidTodd
Inferring Scribes: DavidTodd
Default Present: Kim_Patch, Kathy_Wahlbin, kathleen, +1.720.663.aaaa,
Jon_Avila, Alan_Smith, DavidTodd, wuwei, Jeanne, Jan
Present: Kim_Patch Kathy_Wahlbin kathleen +1.720.663.aaaa Jon_Avila
Alan_Smith DavidTodd wuwei Jeanne Jan
Agenda:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobile-a11y-tf/2014Mar/0018.html
Found Date: 28 Mar 2014
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/03/28-mobile-a11y-minutes.html
People with action items:
WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.
[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]
David Todd
720-663-2815
IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: 84143607.gif
Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 14:54:52 UTC