Re: VR schema proposal - need some help

Hi! Following up on my previous message....thanks!

*Hi everyone! My client, www.matterport.com <http://www.matterport.com/> is
ready to disclose. :) We have some base code on this page. The
"ToBeDetermined" you see are being worked on. They needed to confirm
internally if they would use GPS coordinates, so they will be adding those
any if you don't see them. Also, the player type is also being considered.
Other than that how is this source code looking for a starting point? They
added it to the head.*

*https://matterport.com/3d-space/72-golden-eagle-irvine/*
<https://matterport.com/3d-space/72-golden-eagle-irvine/>

Aaron Abbott

inbound marketing consultant | marketing technologist | digital media
remixer
website:     https://persuasivedata.com
let's connect:     www.linkedin.com/in/aaronabbott
*We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams...*

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Aaron Abbott <aaron@persuasivedata.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone! My client, www.matterport.com is ready to disclose. :) We
> have some base code on this page. The "ToBeDetermined" you see are being
> worked on. They needed to confirm internally if they would use GPS
> coordinates, so they will be adding those any if you don't see them. Also,
> the player type is also being considered. Other than that how is this
> source code looking for a starting point? They added it to the head.
>
> https://matterport.com/3d-space/72-golden-eagle-irvine/
>
> Aaron Abbott
>
> inbound marketing consultant | marketing technologist | digital media
> remixer
> website:     https://persuasivedata.com
> let's connect:     www.linkedin.com/in/aaronabbott
> *We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams...*
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Aaron Abbott <aaron@persuasivedata.com>
> wrote:
>
>> My main contact has been on vacation. She's back next week. More to come!
>> Thanks for checking, Thad!!!
>>
>> Aaron Abbott
>>
>> inbound marketing consultant | marketing technologist | digital media
>> remixer
>> website:     https://persuasivedata.com
>> let's connect:     www.linkedin.com/in/aaronabbott
>> *We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams...*
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Aaron,
>>>
>>> Any more progress towards your VR schema proposal ?
>>>
>>> -Thad
>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:46 PM Timothy Holborn <
>>> timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thad,
>>>>
>>>> Makes sense to me to have a different group of properties to support MR
>>>> (AR/VR) application.
>>>>
>>>> Ie: AR logo (Bit like ico or flavicon) (denoted with a recommended
>>>> formats, types and sizes in either 2d or 3d formats).
>>>>
>>>> Which may be a property under MrMediaObjects
>>>>
>>>> Or something else so we don't have people complaining about patriarchal
>>>> terminology...?!
>>>>
>>>> Tim.h.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu., 29 Jun. 2017, 4:54 am Thad Guidry, <thadguidry@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Aaron,
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, right in that case its still a MediaObject.
>>>>>
>>>>> But since this object is used in the VR industry, which is still
>>>>> developing and new formats and new containers are still being created all
>>>>> the time, we will need to surface those common properties, as Vicki says,
>>>>> into a new Type for the industry to utilize.  Just don't lose sight of how
>>>>> the Broadcasting industry also deals with containers and formats that are
>>>>> very similar in your use case, is all I am asking :)  (your VRObject might
>>>>> just be a container format that becomes an industry standard later on, and
>>>>> that's fine also)
>>>>>
>>>>> To answer your previous previous questions, Yes currently its fine to
>>>>> say that a particular MediaObject or VRObject can contain many parts such
>>>>> as many ImageObject's
>>>>> You can currently use hasPart which is borrowed from CreativeWork to
>>>>> say that
>>>>>
>>>>> {
>>>>>   "@context": "http://schema.org",
>>>>>   "@type": "MediaObject",
>>>>>   "contentUrl": "http://media.example.org/data
>>>>> /0/previews/Edinburgh_Streets.vrn",
>>>>>   "description": "VRnow scene of part of Edinburgh streets",
>>>>>   "duration": "T0M60S",
>>>>>   "encodingFormat": "VRnow",
>>>>>   "name": "Edinburgh_Streets.vrn",
>>>>>   "hasPart": [
>>>>>             {
>>>>>               "@type": "ImageObject",
>>>>>               "name": "A pic of Charlotte Square"
>>>>>             },
>>>>>             {
>>>>>               "@type": "ImageObject",
>>>>>               "name": "A pic of Princes Street"
>>>>>             }
>>>>>           ]
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> On the Playground at *http://tinyurl.com/y95vhwdk
>>>>> <http://tinyurl.com/y95vhwdk>*
>>>>>
>>>>> Your welcome Aaron !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:37 PM Aaron Abbott <
>>>>> aaron@persuasivedata.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thad,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am meeting with my client tomorrow and will get as many answers and
>>>>>> details as possible. I will try to get one of their lead developers
>>>>>> involved on this thread as well. Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as a clump of pictures, it's not like that. The clump of
>>>>>> images are available, but the final embed is an assembled self-contained
>>>>>> media object. An similar example would be the use of a SWF from and FLA if
>>>>>> we were still doing Flash. Like I said though, let me see if I can get them
>>>>>> to jump into the discussion, and if I can get permission to expose who they
>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the help!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aaron Abbott
>>>>>>
>>>>>> inbound marketing consultant | marketing technologist | digital media
>>>>>> remixer
>>>>>> website:     https://persuasivedata.com
>>>>>> let's connect:     www.linkedin.com/in/aaronabbott
>>>>>> *We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams...*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure that's fine.  But...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd prefer to get other industry players, not just Aaron's 1 client
>>>>>>> perspective.
>>>>>>> That's all I am saying.  This has a impact on a large domain that is
>>>>>>> already fast moving and going through rapid change.  Let's get those other
>>>>>>> companies viewpoints as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For instance, Aaron who is the manufacturer of this particular
>>>>>>> camera they use ?
>>>>>>> Knowing if it actually produces some metadata, or at least reviewing
>>>>>>> a spec sheet from its objects can help us quite a bit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is a clump of images for some VR usage really need to be labeled as
>>>>>>> VirtualRealityObject ?  Or is this simply a "movie" or "set of moving
>>>>>>> images" ?  That's what I am trying to surface.  Aaron is not really
>>>>>>> providing some concrete details, and I'd like to hear from other
>>>>>>> competitors in the VR industry as well for broader alignment if we are
>>>>>>> going to start broadly.  (Hello Facebook and Google!)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Thad
>>>>>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>