Thad,
I am meeting with my client tomorrow and will get as many answers and
details as possible. I will try to get one of their lead developers
involved on this thread as well. Thanks!
As far as a clump of pictures, it's not like that. The clump of images are
available, but the final embed is an assembled self-contained media object.
An similar example would be the use of a SWF from and FLA if we were still
doing Flash. Like I said though, let me see if I can get them to jump into
the discussion, and if I can get permission to expose who they are.
Thanks for the help!
Aaron Abbott
inbound marketing consultant | marketing technologist | digital media
remixer
website: https://persuasivedata.com
let's connect: www.linkedin.com/in/aaronabbott
*We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams...*
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure that's fine. But...
>
> I'd prefer to get other industry players, not just Aaron's 1 client
> perspective.
> That's all I am saying. This has a impact on a large domain that is
> already fast moving and going through rapid change. Let's get those other
> companies viewpoints as well.
>
> For instance, Aaron who is the manufacturer of this particular camera they
> use ?
> Knowing if it actually produces some metadata, or at least reviewing a
> spec sheet from its objects can help us quite a bit.
>
> Is a clump of images for some VR usage really need to be labeled as
> VirtualRealityObject ? Or is this simply a "movie" or "set of moving
> images" ? That's what I am trying to surface. Aaron is not really
> providing some concrete details, and I'd like to hear from other
> competitors in the VR industry as well for broader alignment if we are
> going to start broadly. (Hello Facebook and Google!)
>
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>