- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 01:19:40 +0200
- To: public-microxml (public-microxml@w3.org) <public-microxml@w3.org>
My two cents: In think it would be good if this comment - which occurs at the first line of the spec - before any DOCTYPE (of which there is none), was changed:[1] <!-- This document is also conforming MicroXML. --> The comment indicates that the spec document is conforming in more than one way - probably as HTML as well as as MicroXML. Whereas the truth is that the spec neither conforms as HTML, nor as XML/MicroXML. The first, due to lack of proper DOCTYPE, the latter, because of the HTML MIME type. I suggest to add an HTML DOCTYPE so that it at least conforms as HTML. And to change the comment to say that the document conforms as MicroXML, if the DOCTYPE is removed (and the MIME type is changed). [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/microxml/raw-file/tip/spec/microxml.html -- leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 23:20:09 UTC