- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:36:45 +0100
- To: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
On 25/09/2012 16:08, Andrew Welch wrote: > On 25 September 2012 13:06, Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote: >> Aim towards a comparison of benchmarks for XML parsers v >> MicroXML parsers (both with MicroXML documents, of course)? >> In the hope that a by-product of simplicity could be improved >> performance and lower memory requirements? (Besides less >> pain for parser writers and users.) > > To put things into a perspective, this is an example of some xml I see > now and again (the most recent being today): > > <aa><![CDATA[1.12345]]></aa> > <bb><![CDATA[12312]]></bb> > <cc><![CDATA[0.345]]></cc> > > ...yep, every value is serialized in a cdata section. This is usually > because it was constructed as a string and written to disk, and a lone > & or < caused a well-formedness error, and the quick-fix is to add the > cdata sections to the string construction. > > Hopefully its this sort of thing microxml will help fix... > > > Currently it would seem that micro-xml's main contribution to that sort of thing is to remove the "quick fix" David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 15:37:38 UTC