- From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:33:34 -0400
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, public-microxml@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2012 12:34:24 UTC
On 9/13/2012 8:21 AM, James Clark wrote: > > Attribute value normalization would probably get my vote for the > ugliest thing in XML. > > What would be the real, practical downside of not having this in MicroXML? I still think it could be consistent with the stated goal of MicroXML shall specify a data model and a mapping from the syntax to the data model, which shall be substantially consistent with XML 1.0 depending on how substantial the inconsistency is If a MicroXML parser provides attribute values with newlines where an XML parser provides attribute values with spaces instead, who will suffer? I suppose anybody tokenizing attribute values on space would have to upgrade their processor to tokenize on space and newline? How are tabs treated, typically? -Mike Sokolov
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2012 12:34:24 UTC