- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:29:47 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua1LamYAc4Xr-kki4JLt_h1wJLofAnrMsdCBdGnPduWtZQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Rushforth, Peter < Peter.Rushforth@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca> wrote: > ** > Info > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg07108.html > > Might be wise to assume that stacked extensions will not get (easily) > approved, > I think it's better to do the right thing and worry later if that does not work out, rather than make a priori assumptions either way. > hence microxml > might want to split from xml and create its own suffix. > -1 > My understanding is that what is achieved by suffixes could also be > achieved with paramters, > so if inheritance from XML is desired it might be reasonable to go with > registering a parameter for application/xml, > similar to how AtomPub extended Atom. (application/atom+xml -> > application/atom+xml;type="feed" + application/atom+xml;type="entry"), > ie application/xml;type="micro" > The atom entry example is apples and oranges. An Atom entry is a specific content model. -1 to application/xml;type="micro" -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 18:30:17 UTC