Re: Should we say anything on security?

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Mike Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net> wrote:

> On 09/12/2012 09:33 AM, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
>
>> I think this is the way almost every implementor has interpreted it as
>> well.  Some, such as libxml will take advantage of the "in a normal way"
>> clause to at least try to show the user any further fatal errors beyond the
>> first, to make fix-up a bit less painful, but yeah that hardly counts as
>> liberal acceptance, and anyway most parsers do stop dead at the first fatal
>> error.
>>
>>
>>  Not completely - MarkLogic for example, provides "fixup" capabilities in
> its parser that include undeclared ISO xml entity handling, and I think
> will even fix well-formedness problems a-la tidy.


Err, that is not an XML parser, then, any more than Tidy is, or html5lib,
though both can parse XML-like thingies.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
Founding Partner, Zepheira        http://zepheira.com
http://wearekin.org
http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
http://copia.ogbuji.net
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
http://twitter.com/uogbuji