- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 01:36:11 -0400
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 10:22 +0700, James Clark wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > I've just found RFC6657 which changes the rules on charset handling for > text/* media types. I think this would also make text/microxml a viable > option. Yes, that's a good point. > I had a look at RFC3023 (the XML Media Types RFC) and found this: [...] wow, thanks for dredging that up! > This suggest to me that application/micro+xml or application/*+micro+xml > are reasonable (at least in the opinion of the XML Media Types RFC's > authors). Murata-San and Martin Duerst, possibly. > W3C has a fast-track process for MIME media type registrations but only > > for formats whose specification is on the (not so fast) W3C Rec track. > > > I guess we could try to publish our spec as an RFC as well as as a W3C CG > report. If there's enough uptake that may make sense, or even as a W3C Recommendation if there are people willing to do the work. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 05:36:39 UTC