- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 01:43:35 -0400
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, public-microxml@w3.org
On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 10:50 +0700, James Clark wrote: > Writing the production for char like this would, I think, make the logic > behind the definition clearer: [..] > nonCharacterCodePoint ::= [#xFDD0-#xFDEF] | [#xFFFE-#xFFFF] | > [#x1FFFE-#x1FFFF] > | [#x2FFFE-#x2FFFF] | [#x3FFFE-#x3FFFF] | > [#x4FFFE-#x4FFFF] etc It might be even clearer to ignore history :) and list the codepoints individually where they are two-character ranges: nonCharacterCodePoint ::= [#xFDD0-#xFDEF] | #xFFFE | #xFFFF | #x1FFFE | #x1FFFF | .... Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml Co-author, "Frightening children with XML"
Received on Sunday, 9 September 2012 05:44:00 UTC