- From: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net>
- Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:55:55 -0400
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, public-microxml@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 8 September 2012 15:55:55 UTC
On 9/8/2012 11:31 AM, James Clark wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Mike Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net > <mailto:sokolov@falutin.net>> wrote: > > On 9/8/2012 1:14 AM, James Clark wrote: > > > I find the case for excluding non-characters pretty > compelling. I would state it like this: > > Just for the sake of completeness, would you mind explaining > what's compelling about it? > > > A design that disallows #xFFFE and #xFFFF but allows all other > non-characters can be justified only by appealing to history. As I > mentioned earlier, I want to avoid that as much as possible. > > a) I want to minimize the things in MicroXML that make sense only if > you know the historical context of MicroXML. If somebody who knows > Thanks, makes sense now. History, of course to some extent is inescapable, but at least there is some logic in disallowing non-character codepoints that is (mostly :)) independent of it. Mike
Received on Saturday, 8 September 2012 15:55:55 UTC