- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:20:35 -0400
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>, public-microxml@w3.org
James Clark scripsit: > For robust, standards-compliant delivery of HTML5, my current inclination > is to use an MicroXML->HTML5 serializer that does the right thing with > empty elements, and adds a DOCTYPE declaration. We should at least have a > standard way of representing an HTML5 DOM (at least any HTML5 DOM > representable in the HTML syntax) in MicroXML, which means we need some > convention for dealing with xlink:href. I agree that the way to deal with it is by dropping the prefix. > So my current position is: > > - no bare DOCTYPE > - no to the additional HTML5 restriction on XML comments Concedo. -- Híggledy-pìggledy / XML programmers John Cowan Try to escape those / I-eighteen-N woes; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Incontrovertibly / What we need more of is cowan@ccil.org Unicode weenies and / François Yergeaus.
Received on Saturday, 8 September 2012 04:20:58 UTC