- From: Rushforth, Peter <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:15:51 +0000
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- CC: "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
> As such it should have as few as possible (and preferably no) > reserved words. I agree in general, but things like references are often used in things like schema references, processing instructions and what have you, so it would be smarter to include the set of reserved words which would allow you to forego other syntaxes and more specific reserved words. ie simple but not too simple. Peter
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 12:16:20 UTC