- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:17:57 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua0UyDE0gj364b1N+6ifDG1aVj1fv7PWsmqrpXCKgLY3OQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:00 AM, David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com> wrote: > I agree with Liam. > NO > in attribute values. period. > > Why ? Because I believe that if microXML documents *as is* are not > parsable by existing XML processors then we have invented a totally new > language and any attempt to be close-to-xml is pointless besides the > familiarity aspect and we should just start over. I believe it would be > a huge mistake to require microxml processors just to parse microxml. We > then have the chicken & egg problem of *having* to make new toolsets just > to get started. If MicroXML is parseable (even if not identically in data > model) then we can start using it right now with XML parsers. > I'm really confused by this. ">" is not forbidden in XML attribute values. Are you thinking of "<"? -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 15:18:24 UTC