- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 02:55:41 -0400
- To: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
James Fuller scripsit: > * I maybe wrong, but I don't think the recent publication communicated > to the world at large that we are seeking public review … we should > reinforce this message I agree. > I think the spec is remarkably brief, concise and from a personal > point of view cohesive (at least for my purposes) … and I note this > single document replaces a number of other docs (wondering what the > page count ratio is) MicroXML: 7 pages JSON RFC: 10 pages XML Rec (5th Edition): 30 pages + XML Infoset: 14 pages = 43 pages > I will start writing up some tutorial around the parsers i've created. Excellent. I'm going back to working on MicroLark. -- Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so, John Cowan is a tax on income. --Lord Macnaghten (1901) cowan@ccil.org
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 06:56:04 UTC