- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:35:59 -0400
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>, "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
James Clark scripsit: > The Canonical MicroXML for a document is the unique MicroXML document that My proposal for this: "The canonical form of a MicroXML document is the MicroXML document that" (etc.) The use of "the" indicates uniqueness. > Is this worth including in the spec? I haven't tried, but I think it would fit into the free half-page at the end. If so, I'd be in favor of it. (MicroXML is still smaller than JSON.) -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan It's the old, old story. Droid meets droid. Droid becomes chameleon. Droid loses chameleon, chameleon becomes blob, droid gets blob back again. It's a classic tale. --Kryten, Red Dwarf
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 14:36:29 UTC