- From: George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:29:26 +0200
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- CC: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, public-microxml@w3.org, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
I think that it may be easier to change things at this stage, if needed, and passing some real use scenarios first may help understand if there is anything that needs to be changed. Best Regards, George -- George Cristian Bina <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger http://www.oxygenxml.com On 11/19/12 7:18 PM, Brian Kardell wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:07 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org > <mailto:cowan@mercury.ccil.org>> wrote: > > Brian Kardell scripsit: > > > For my own curiosity mainly, what benefit really comes from moving > > this to a normal wg at this stage? > > The additional publicity/prestige that comes from becoming a WG > Recommendation, in principle equal to XML. > > -- > No saves, Antonio, loke es morirse en su lingua. Es komo > John Cowan > kedarse soliko en el silensyo kada dya ke Dyo da, komo > cowan@ccil.org <mailto:cowan@ccil.org> > ser sikileoso sin saver porke. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > --Marcel Cohen, 1985 > > > > I disagree that this is necessarily a good thing - I think if there is a > hope to pull this off it has to involve some "on its own merits" > growth/uptake by a community lest it be viewed as being something handed > from on high. I'm curious to hear James Clark's view on this...
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 17:29:54 UTC