- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:06:48 +0100
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, public-microxml@w3.org, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
> For my own curiosity mainly, what benefit really comes from moving this to a > normal wg at this stage? Its a good question to ask … my feeling is that having the WG give its approval would help in giving a positive indication to a larger community. … but I can't help to think that more grassroots efforts are required to tell the story of microxml to the wider community. I would rather handover to the WG the moment we start getting some kind of uptake with microxml, let the community at large push for WG approval/consideration by voting with their adoption versus some automatic reaction. So … perhaps we are putting the cart before the horse by considering WG escalation first, perhaps the next step is some kind of noise about microxml, how to use it, where to use it, tutorials, etc. thoughts ? J
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 17:07:15 UTC