- From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:18:28 +0000
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, public-microxml@w3.org
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 11:19:18 UTC
Regarding specification style: How about the error handling spec being maintained as a "living standard"? ---- Stephen D Green On 19 November 2012 08:23, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: > >> On 17.11.2012 3:53, James Clark wrote: >> > I have been writing a parser that does error recovery. >> >> Hi James, >> >> is your error recovery based on XML-ER >> (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xml-er/raw-file/tip/Overview.html) or are you >> thinking about different approach? >> > > Different. > > - I believe the architecture should make it possible to use schema > information if it is available > - I believe error handling for (Micro)XML should be carefully designed, > rather than copied from HTML5 > - Not streaming. I think streaming prevents adequate handling of cases > where the input does not consist of a single element. > - Different style of specification (I don't like the WHATWG style) > > James > >
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 11:19:18 UTC