Re: Proposed extension of data model

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:22 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:

> James Clark scripsit:
>
> > I would like to change the Data Model section of the spec to separate out
> > the aspects of the data model that are purely there as a result of the
> > syntactic constraints of MicroXML.
>
> Fair enough.  In that case, I propose that the following text in Section 2
> of the current draft:
>
>     A name item is a non-empty string. The first character in the
>     string MUST match the production nameStartChar, and any subsequent
>     characters MUST match the production nameChar. In addition, a name
>     item occurring as a key in an attributes map MUST not be xmlns.
>
>     Any character occurring in the value of an attributes map or as
>     a member of a content list MUST match the production char.
>
> be reduced to the first sentence only.
>

If you mean this reduction only to apply to the "unsullied-by-XML" data
model subsection, then yeah.  But just checking that you don't suggest that
we'd remove the extra detail from the spec entirely.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
Founding Partner, Zepheira        http://zepheira.com
http://wearekin.org
http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
http://copia.ogbuji.net
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
http://twitter.com/uogbuji