- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:21:47 -0700
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: "public-microxml (public-microxml@w3.org)" <public-microxml@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua1SRRCBsvo9tx1yMVTco0V0HjQ7R4UN8h1mb9OP=xnD+g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:32 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > The W3C XML Core WG <http://www.w3.org/XML/Core> discussed MicroXML > briefly last week at a face-to-face meeting, and at more length today > on the phone. I belong to the WG, but didn't attend the F2F. > > Since there hasn't been a posting here for more than a month, and no > changes to the draft for six weeks, the Core WG would like to know if > anyone on this Community Group objects to transferring further work on > the MicroXML specification itself to the Core WG in hopes that it will > eventually lead to a W3C Recommendation. Other possible work items such > as MicroAF, MicroExamplotron, and Automatic Namespaces would remain in > the hands of this group. > > This does not constitute any sort of commitment by the Core WG to actually > work on MicroXML, of course. However, its charter will be renewed next > month, so this is a good moment to add MicroXML as an optional work item. > > If there are any objections, please post them here or email me privately, > or in the alternative communicate with Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>. > Giving reasons would be a Good Thing. > No objections. Sounds like the right and reasonable next step. I'm sure you'll keep us posted. -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 23:22:16 UTC