- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 07:12:08 +0100
- To: MicroXML <public-microxml@w3.org>
On 27 July 2012 01:11, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Uche Ogbuji scripsit: > >> Yeah, that's one approach for other such use-cases as well (such as >> pagination). George and others might have other objections to PI/comment >> unification, but for me I'm leaning towards seeing comments almost as C >> does, as just a noisy form of whitespace. This usage would imbue them with >> much more fundamental significance. I guess PIs are analogous to #pragmas. > > So they are. If we wanted to unify comments and PIs, we could say that > a comment of the form <--? ... --> was reserved for PI-like use. > That doesn't help with delivering to browsers, though. Do you see browsers as a recipient of MicroXML John? As with stylesheet usage I'd prefer to see the browser receiving something transformed for that environment? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Friday, 27 July 2012 06:12:41 UTC