- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:29:00 +0100
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, public-microxml@w3.org
On 26 July 2012 12:17, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:26 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > >> Actually I am less convinced that the xml-stylesheet PI is a good >> argument for keeping them. The intention here is presumably to link to >> an XSLT stylesheet and presumably XSLT will be full XML so this is only >> of use to micro-xml consumers that also have a full XML processing stack >> available. > > I had been more imagining people linking to CSS. I would hope that > MicroXML would attract people who were not currently using XML; such > people are likely at first to use CSS as their style language. Does anyone ever actually do that? What was your reason for creating XSLT 1.0 in the first place? :) -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 11:29:30 UTC