- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:19:49 -0400
- To: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
- Cc: Hans Franke <raffzahn@yahoo.de>, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>, MicroXML <public-microxml@w3.org>
David Lee scripsit: > What is relevant IMHO is if it is "useful" Indeed. For example (and this was why I mentioned SOAP in my Editor's Draft), the language in which SOAP must be expressed is XML without DOCTYPE declarations or PIs. If MicroXML does not contain these, then it could be succinctly said that the language of SOAP is MicroXML, and it would no longer be necessary to include the XML spec in the essential references of the SOAP definition. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. --Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 15:20:18 UTC